McVeigh und die Bombung des Alfred-E.-Murrah-Bundeshauses in Oklahoma Stadt

Zwei Aufsätze aus dem Internet – und noch ein weiterer




Dienstsiegel des BATF

Einige Begriffe, die das Verständnis erleichtern:

Waco = Stadt in Texas
OKC = Oklahoma City
BATF = "Burea of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms"; eine große Polizeibehörde, auch mit Scharfschützen und Panzern
FBI = "Federal Bureau of Investigation"; Bundespolizei
ANFO = "Ammonium Nitrate and Fuel Oil bomb"; eine neuartige Bombe, die aus Kunstdünger und Dieselkraftstoff gebaut sein soll
VIN = "vehicle identification number"; Fahrgestellnummer, die an mehreren Stellen des Fahrzeuges angebracht wird



Thirty Questions on the Oklahoma City Bombing

(Fette Auszeichnungen nicht im Original: http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a39e76a07613d.htm )

1. If the bombing of the Alfred E. Murrah Federal building in Oklahoma City was a terrorist reprisal for the Federal massacre of the Branch Davidians at Waco, why were no BATF or FBI agents injured? Why was EVERY BADGE-CARRYING FEDERAL AGENT absent from work at nine o'clock on a weekday morning and their offices staffed only with civilian clerical workers?

2. When the word first got out that no Federal agents had been present in the building, the BATF produced its Resident Agent Alex McCauley who told a long story about his own heroism and that of a fellow ATF man who allegedly fell three floors in an elevator, walked away from it, and then helped rescue others trapped by the bomb. This was quickly exposed as a fabrication i
n an angry interview by building maintenance supervisor Duane James, who described McCauley's story as "pure fantasy". James examined the elevator in question and also the central control panel and pointed out a number of technical and logical reasons why the miraculous elevator incident simply couldn't have happened in the way claimed. The McCauley account was quietly retracted and flushed down the memory hole by the ATF, with the help of the media. They now admit that McCauley was nowhere near the building when the bomb went off, although they refuse to discuss his exact whereabouts or the whereabouts of any other ATF agent at the time of the explosion. Will BATF Agent Alex McCauley be disciplined for telling a self-serving lie which falsely made himself out to be a hero? If that was not the purpose, why did he make this palpably false public statement?

3. Why was U.S. Judge Wayne Alley, whose office was located in the Federal building, warned several weeks in advance in a Justice Department memo to be prepared for an unnamed "terrorist act" directed against the Federal building?

4. Judge Alley made the above admission to the Portland OREGONIAN immediately after the bombing. He has since refused to repeat it or allow himself to be interviewed again. Why?

5. Why did Ken Stern of the American Jewish Committee fax warnings to Federal judges and officials, legislators, and prosecutors warning of a possible attack on a government building of installation on the second anniversary of Waco on April 10th, 1995, nine days before the OKC bombing?

6. "Norma", a witness who worked in an office building just down the street from the Federal building, told reporter Sherry Koonce what she saw prior to the explosion: "The day was fine, everything was normal when I arrived for work at about 7:45 A.M. There was some talk about the bomb squad among the employees at our office. We wondered what it was doing in our parking lot. Around nine I heard and felt a huge explosion. Then someone said it had to be a bomb, and we all knew. I remembered the bomb squad in our parking lot and knew what had happened." "Norma" has since quit her job, gone into hiding and refused to speak again to any reporters or investigators. So have a number of other people who saw the heavily armed and equipped bomb squad in the area up to three hours before the blast. Why?

7. Why has all mention of the facts outlined in questions 1 thru 6 disappeared from the news media after the first week of coverage of the bombing? Why has the media consistently suppressed and refused to report any information or evidence which indicates that, at the very least and regardless of who was responsible, there was Federal foreknowledge that the bombing would take place?

8. By definition, a terrorist must take credit for his violence, or else there is no compelling reason to commit a crime. The specific purpose of terrorism is to gain a political end through the credible threat to commit future acts of violence. No one has claimed credit for the Oklahoma City bombing. Militia and right-wing groups, the alleged masterminds and presumed beneficiaries, have been particularly vehement in denouncing the explosion and in many cases have cooperated directly with Federal agencies to absolve themselves of any involvement. The only statement of alleged political motive we have comes from the very government which was attacked. Why is this?

9. Did the Alfred Murrah building warehouse documents relating to the attack on the Branch Davidians at Waco? If so, what happened to those documents? Were they destroyed? If so, were any copies kept elsewhere? If not, why not?

10. Will the missing papers, if any, affect former Attorney General Ramsey Clark's lawsuit against the ATF and FBI on behalf of the Branch Davidian survivors?

11. Why did the Director of the University of Oklahoma's Geological Survey, Dr. Charles Mankin, tell the media that according to two different seismographic records there were TWO blasts, the second approximately eight seconds after the first?

12. The news media initially reported two explosions, based on eyewitness testimony. Why did this version of events disappear from print and the air waves within twenty-four hours?

13. U.S. government Technical Manual No. 9-1910 from the Department of the Army and Air Force entitled MILITARY EXPLOSIVES, which specifies that ANFO, the acronym for Ammonium Nitrate and Fuel Oil bomb said to be used on the Murrah building, requires a greater than 99% purity of ammonium nitrate, as well as a specific dryness before it can be mixed with diesel fuel to create an explosive substance. The manual further spells out that even under ideal conditions (not often reached even by experts) 4,800 pounds of ANFO explosive would create a much smaller crater than the one left in front of the Murrah building, and its shock wave could not possibly wield the force necessary to compromise the building's concrete support. The FBI claims that the ANFO charge was made from 50 bags of fertilizer. Ammonium nitrate fertilizers comes in much weaker concentrations than the 99%-plus required for explosives. Creating concentrated amounts of ammonium nitrate is quite complex, and would require many bags of fertilizer. In short, according to the government's own textbook, the Oklahoma City bombing COULD NOT HAVE HAPPENED IN THE WAY THE FBI SAYS IT HAPPENED. IT IS A PHYSICAL, CHEMICAL, AND THERMODYNAMIC IMPOSSIBILITY. Why is the FBI lying?

14. Retired Air Force Brigadier General Benton K. Partin, former commander of the Air Force Armament Technology Laboratory, a 25-year expert in the design and development of bombs, urged Senators and Congressmen to delay the destruction of the Murrah building site. Partin stated in a news release, "When I first saw the picture of the truck bomb's asymmetrical damage to the Federal building in Oklahoma, my immediate reaction was that the pattern of damage would have been technically impossible without supplementary demolition charges at some of the reinforced concrete bases inside the building, a standard demolition technique." Partin further explained that "reinforced concrete targets in large buildings are hard targets to blast. I know of no way possible to reproduce the apparent building damage through simply a truck bomb effort." General Partin's request to have the bomb site preserved in order to examine the possibility of a second explosion was ignored by the government. Why?

15. General Partin's press release, quoted above, was reprinted in the John Birch Society magazine NEW AMERICAN. Based on this the news media launched an egregious and bogus smear campaign against General Benton K. Partin, claiming falsely that he was a member of the John Birch Society and therefore a "right- wing extremist". General Partin has been forced repeatedly to threaten lawsuits in order to force grudging and deliberately downplayed retractions and corrections of this allegation. His alleged JBS membership still appears in print and broadcast media today as fact even though the media are by now perfectly well aware that the allegation is false. Why are the news media telling a deliberate lie in order to discredit a highly respected expert who questions the official government version of Oklahoma City?

16. There have been repeated studies done by a variety of accredited explosives experts and professional demolition contractors, such as former FBI agent Ted Gunderson. All of these have stated their professional opinion that the destruction of the Murrah building could only have been accomplished with top-grade military explosives, detonators, and careful placement of multiple charges. Why have the media ignored these expert opinions? Why, indeed, have the media engaged in a concerted campaign to abuse, vilify, discredit and marginalize as a "crank" or a "right-wing extremist" any explosives expert or engineer who questions the official FBI version of the bomb's construction and explosive power?

17. There is not a single piece of concrete evidence to connect either Timothy McVeigh or Terry Nichols to any militia or right-wing group. Why has the news media refused to acknowledge this fact and continued to spread the patently false assertion that McVeigh was a member of a militia group?

18. Terry Nichols has been married twice, once to a Mexican woman and once to a Filipina. Obviously, a man who marries women of color not once but twice and has children with them can hardly be called a racist. Why has this fact, which clearly precludes any racist or neo-Nazi involvement in the bombing of the kind which is repeatedly implied by the media, not been given any significant exposure at all?

19. Having allegedly just committed a coldly calculated, carefully and meticulously planned mass murder, why did Timothy McVeigh then suddenly turn into a Clouseau-like klutz and do everything but send up a flare to draw attention to himself, speeding out of the state at almost 100 mph in a car without a license plate, virtually guaranteeing that he would be stopped?

20. Timothy McVeigh is a highly trained combat NCO who won a Bronze Star for courage under fire in the Gulf. Having been stopped by a state trooper, being armed with a pistol, knowing that he now faced either execution or imprisonment for the rest of his natural life, why did McVeigh make no move at all to defend himself or escape, but instead surrendered like a little lamb?

21. FBI agents are said to have tracked down McVeigh's truck rental agency by finding a vehicle identification number (VIN) on the truck's rear axle. This axle was found either in the bomb crater, according to the mayor of Oklahoma City's initial press statement, or three blocks away according to the later FBI version. Which statement is true?

22. There is another problem to the Ryder truck tale. No rear axle on any vehicle manufactured in America is imprinted with a VIN, even after recent legislation forcing manufacturers to place multiple VINS on the engine, firewall, and frame to discourage chop shops. When queried, a spokesman for Ryder told reporters than it does not imprint additional VINS on its trucks. The only conceivable number available on a rear axle is a part number, but a part number couldn't lead to the identification of a specific vehicle. We have here another case where the FBI version of events simply COULD NOT HAVE HAPPENED in the way the Bureau claims it happened. Where did the VIN story come from? Why has it been created and circulated by the media?

23. Did McVeigh use fake I.D. or his real I.D. to rent the truck? The FBI has told both stories.

24. The FBI detained and interrogated Timothy McVeigh's young sister Jennifer and Terry Nichols' twelve year-old son. They announced in the media that both of them were suspects and that Jennifer McVeigh was facing indictment and the death penalty. These charges disappeared from the media and both young people were released. What is the story here?

25. Who is John Doe Number Two? Does he exist at all? The FBI first conducted a nationwide manhunt for JD-2 over a period of several weeks. Then they claimed that a U.S. Army soldier on leave, whose published photographs bear no resemblance whatsoever to the photofits, was JD-2. Then they claimed for some months that JD-2 does not exist and all the witnesses who saw him were mistaken. Now they are hedging again and say they have an "open mind" about whether John Doe Number Two exists. What is going on here?

26. In January of 1996 National Public Radio broadcast a half-hour special containing interviews with half a dozen witnesses who personally saw John Doe Number Two in the Ryder truck with Timothy McVeigh on the morning of the bombing. These witnesses all had one thing in common; other than a cursory preliminary interview by the FBI they had up until that time been approached by neither the prosecution nor the defense to appear as witnesses at the trial. Why not? Will any witnesses who saw John Doe Number Two be called to testify?

27. In the summer of 1995 a mysterious American named Daniel Spiegelman was arrested in the Netherlands for trafficking in stolen diamonds and antiques. In July of 1995 the Janet Reno Justice Department quietly applied for Spiegelman's extradition to the United States IN CONNECTION WITH THE OKLAHOMA CITY BOMBING. This was accompanied by representations at the highest level demanding that the Netherlands courts hear the case in camera and that the proceedings be kept completely secret. Through his attorney Spiegelman fought extradition, a Dutch judge refused to impose secrecy on the hearing, the media got hold of it, and Janet Reno allegedly withdrew the extradition request, whereupon the entire bizarre episode vanished from public view. No more media blackout in the OKC case has been more complete than the blackout imposed over the name of Daniel Spiegelman; it is as if he has stepped off the face of the planet. Who is Daniel Spiegelman? What connection does he have with Oklahoma City? Is he John Doe Number Two? Does he know who John Doe Number Two is?

28. FBI informant and star witness Michael Fortier, who admits to trading his testimony for lenient sentencing on gun charges himself, claims that he and Timothy McVeigh scouted out the Murrah building several weeks in advance looking for the BATF offices therein. If that is true, why did Timothy NcVeigh stop the Ryder truck at a gas station on the morning of the bombing and ask directions to the building? And why did he park the truck on the side of the building the farthest away from the BATF offices, when there was an available parking lot which would have placed the truck bomb almost directly under the windows of the BATF even if it was seven stories up?


29. Why was the reaction of the Clinton administration, blaming right-wing radio talk shows for the incident and demanding the most draconian police state legislation ever proposed in the United States, so swift and obviously organized? The air of orchestration about the whole government response did not escape notice even at the time, in all the high emotionalism prevalent, and was commented on by a number of observers all across the political spectrum. A blizzard of OKC-related "domestic terrorism" bills were rushed into Congress in a matter of days, some of them pre-written and already printed up BEFORE THE BOMBING. These proposed laws cover everything from banning virtually all privately owned firearms to unlimited and court-admissible Federal wiretaps to censorship of the Internet to the suspension of habeas corpus in "terrorism" cases to the grotesque destruction of the First Amendment advocated in Charles Schumer's bill H.R. 2580, which imposes a five-year prison sentence for publicly engaging in "unseemly speculation" and publishing or transmitting by wire or electronic means "baseless conspiracy theories regarding the Federal government of the United States". Who decides what is a "baseless conspiracy theory'? Why, the very same government, of course. How exactly was a normally cumbersome, inefficient, and glacially slow legislative branch able to move so quickly, so comprehensively, and so efficiently in introducing these laws which will strip Americans of what remaining freedoms they have?

30. Why did it take so unconscionably long for the trial of Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols to begin?

Posted on 10/13/2000 16:24:21 PDT by Jefferson Adams


 

Part XIV (A):
Why didn't the Grand Jury find the Evidences of Second Explosion in the OKC Bombing?

Author: Alan Yu Editor: John Yu


Was there a second explosion in the Murrah Federal Building of OKC bombing?

Yes, Based on facts, there must be a second explosion in the Murrah Federal Building of OKC Bombing.

Why?

According to a laboratory nearby, the seismic reading showed two blasts. Some scientists claimed that the second reading of blast could have been caused by the supersonic shock wave of the first blast.

Yet, such kind of opinion has been refuted by the report of Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

(attachment)
=========
Building Performance: Oklahoma City Bombing

The focus of this report is on the nine-story portion of the Murrah Building, which incurred significant damage and partial collapse as a result of the April 19, 1995, bombing. The blast was equivalent to the detonation of approximately 4,000 pounds of TNT.

(Please check on FEMA-OKC http://www.fema.gov/mit/bpat/bpat009.htm)

=========

Bomb ANFO
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4000 pounds TNT bomb = 14920 pounds ammonium nitrate (ANFO)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This is three times more powerful than Tim McVeigh's truck- bomb (ANFO) as reported by the FBI.

Therefore, the opinions that the second seismic reading were caused by first bomb blast's supersonic shock wave has been refuted by the FEMA's report.

Why?

If the second blast reading is truly caused by the supersonic shock wave and there was only one bomb blast, then this bomb blast must be caused by Tim McVeigh's truck-bomb (4,800 lbs. of Ammonium Nitrated mixed with fuel oil according to FBI's representative).

Then, the total destructive power of the single bomb blast & the supersonic shock wave would not exceed the McVeigh's truck-bomb's power by 9,600 lbs. of ANFO (ammonium nitrate fuel oil).

However, based on the FEMA's report, the building's damage should be caused by the detonation of about 14,920 lbs. of ammonium nitrate fuel oil (equivalent to 4,000 lbs. of TNT). This is three times more powerful than Tim McVeigh's ANFO truck-bomb. Therefore, there must be a second bomb blast, and the second seismic reading must be caused by that second blast (and not caused by the supersonic shock wave from the explosion of Tim McVeigh's truck-bomb as some has speculated.). Also, according to the information in the FEMA's report, the second explosion should be equivalent to the detonation of 10,000 lbs. of ammonium nitrate fuel oil (or 3,300 lbs. TNT).

Since the additional blast was the equivalent to 10,000 lbs. ammonium nitrate fuel oil (or 3,300 lbs. of TNT), it has also proven that this second blast reading was caused by another bomb. If the supersonic shock wave were caused by McVeigh's truck-bomb (4,800 lbs. of ANFO), it cannot have equivalent power 10,000 lbs. of ANFO (twice the power of the original truck-bomb). So, there must be additional bomb inside the building.

Thus, the additional blast inside the federal building has caused the most damage (equivalent to the power of 10,000 lbs. of ANFO or 3300 lbs. TNT) and more than that caused by Tim McVeigh's ANFO truck-bomb (4,800 lbs. of ANFO).

This conclusion is in agreement with explosive expert General Partin's professional judgment that the observed damaged must be caused by column-demolition charge placed inside of the building. Furthermore, dynamite had been found on the side of column (inside the Murrah Building).

Beside above information, other news reports also mentioned that there was unexploded bomb inside the federal building.
(attachment) - NEXUS magazine -- (See page 7 on NEXUS, December 1996 - January 1997, by Ian Goddard)

=========
...
5. That bombs were found inside the building, while largely unknown, is no secret. It was reported widely on CNN and local news broadcasts on the day of the blast. Rescue operations were called off each time a bomb was found (i.e., up to four times), and Army bomb-disposal units worked to defuse the bombs. The bombs were found by bomb-sniffing dogs, which indicates that the bombs contained explosive material.
(It means that the authorities found at least four explosive materials --Alan Yu note)

6. KFOR-TV in Oklahoma City reported that two or more of the bombs found inside were "far larger in magnitude than the first that went off inside the building" (remember that seismic readings measured two blasts). A terrorist expert, Dr. Randall Heather, then spoke, saying, "We have both of the bombs that were defuse at the site and they are being taken apart." One must assume, however, that these bombs were eventually misplaced by the FBI, as is common. The news coverage went on to say that another bomb was found strapped to a column next to the day-care center. It is important to note that such a column-strapped bomb is consistent with the blast pattern damage seen, which brigadier General Partin, one of the top munitions experts in the world, says is not consistent with an ANFO
(ammonium nitrate fuel oil) truck-bomb. He says that demolition charges had to be placed on the columns-and, sure enough, one was found that failed to go off. But, like all these bombs, they just seemed to disappear into oblivion along with any continuing media reports or serious inquiries about these bombs.
=========

According to CNN video-tape on April, 19, 95 report: The Oklahoma County Sheriff's Department claims that the large Bomb Squad truck with trailer, which was used later that day to remove the unexploded bombs found inside the Murrah Building, was outside prior to the bombing because a deputy was using it for "routine errands."

Based on the Federal Emergency Management Agency Situation Report for April 20, 1995 which reads: "A second and third bomb were located in the building. The second bomb was disarmed and the third bomb was evacuated (Source: The New American, 20 July 1998, "Proof of Bombs and Cover-up" by William F. Jasper).

The above information proves that some unexploded bombs have been found inside the Federal building.

Furthermore, according to General Partin investigative report submitted to the US Congress on 30 July 95, the ANFO truck- bomb would not be sufficient to achieve the damage observed at the OKC Bombing.

Retired Air Force General Ben Partin, former commander of the Air Force Armament Technology Laboratory, released a report that there HAD to have been explosive charges on the cement columns in the Murrah building in order for them to have been destroyed. An ammonium nitrate bomb could not possibly have done that level of damage to steel reinforced concrete columns on a federal building designed to withstand the complete collapse of the building due to nuclear blast.

(attachment) - Source: The New American, July 20, 1998

=========
"Proof of Bombs and Cover-up" by William F. Jasper

New Evidence

In this article, we present startling new eyewitness testimony concerning demolition charges removed from the Murrah Building and the men who may have planted them there, together with new expert testimony, recently released official records, and some of the most important evidence and supporting documentation that has been reported piecemeal in our previous articles on the bombing. This includes:

World-renowned physicists and an assortment of scientists, engineers, and explosives experts who concur that internal charges must have been used.

A series of Air Force test blasts on concrete structures corroborating General Partin's main contention that air blast from a truck-bomb outside of the building could not possibly account for the pattern and magnitude of the damage to the Murrah Building's superstructure.

A study by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) which acknowledges that a truck-bomb of 4,800 pounds of ANFO (as claimed by the government) would have been insufficient to cause the destruction experienced at the Murrah Building.

=========

The above facts only prove that some corrupted LEO who were in charge of the OKC Bombing investigation might have committed obstruction-of-justice.

Therefore, according to the building damage situation, the FEMA's report, General Partin's investigative report submitted to the US Congress, and news report about unexploded bombs, there must be additional bombs inside the Murrah Federal Building to cause the serious damage. This is also in agreement with the seismic reading--after 10 second of first blast (first seismic reading), there was another blast (second seismic reading).

Also, that's why the Murrah Federal Building (crime scene) was demolished in a very short period of time after the bombing--it is call destruction-of-evidence and obstruction-of-justice.

There was a chance to find out the conspiracy of OKC Bombing from Police Officer Terrance Yeakey. That's because there was no one who wanted justice more than Oklahoma City Police Officer Terrance Yeakey. Police Terrance Yeakey not only knew about the existence of some conspiracy concerning the OKC Bombing case, but he had also become a witness for the trial of Tim McVeigh. Unfortunately, Officer Terrance Yeakey was killed before he could appear to testify at the Denver trial of Timothy McVeigh.

Otherwise, the conspiracy of OKC Bombing could have been exposed to the society.

(attachment) - By Mike Blair (Spotlight Magazine, 5/19/97)
=========
Two key witnesses in the Oklahoma City bombing case will not appear to testify at the Denver trial of Timothy McVeigh because they are dead ...
One is the Oklahoma City Police Officer Terrance Yeakey, The other victim was killed in an air crash. Both deaths took place under questionable circumstances.

However, The Spotlight has obtained a copy of a letter he sent to a victim of the bombing who was questioning the federal government's claims about the cause of the tragedy and those accused as the perpetrators.

>Highlights from his letter follow:

> The man that you and I were talking about in the pictures I have made the
> mistake of asking too many questions as to his role in the bombing and
> was told to back off...
> I was told by several officers he was a ATF agent who was overseeing the
> bombing plot and at the time the photos were taken he was calling in his
> report of what had just went down!

> Knowing what I know now and understanding fully just what went down
> that morning makes me ashamed to wear a badge from Oklahoma City's
> Police Department. I took an oath to uphold the law and to enforce the
> law to the best of my ability. This is something I cannot honestly do and
> hold my head up proud any longer if I keep my silence as I am ordered to
> do...
> The sad truth of the matter is that they have so many police officers
> convinced that by covering up the truth about the operation gone wrong,
> that they are actually doing our citizens a favor. What I want to know is
> how many other operations have they had that blew up in their faces?
> Makes you stop and take another look at Waco...

> Even if I tried to explain it to you the way it was explained to me and the
> ridiculous reason for having our own police department falsify reports to
> their fellow officers, to the citizens of the city and to our country, you
> would feel the way I do about all of this...

=========

Why didn't the Grand Jury successfully find the evidences of a second explosion?
That's because the crime scene (Murrah Federal Building) was demolished shortly after the bombing, the unexploded bombs (which have been found in the Murrah building & reported by news media) have been intentionally denied to exist, and these bombs have been intentionally made to disappear. Such kinds of actions are obviously obstruction of justice. That's because without the above evidences, no one can find the evidences of the second explosion.

It only shows that the corrupted LEO has made a decision that the damage of all of the damage to Murrah Building was solely caused by Tim McVeigh's lone ANFO truck-bomb. After that, they suddenly destroyed the crime scene (Murrah Building) and denied the unexploded bombs' existence, denied the second seismic readings was caused by another explosion, denied some LEO knew of the bombing in advance and made these bombs (which have been found in Murrah building as originally reported by news media) to disappear.

Since above evidences have been either destroyed or made to disappear, it has shown that the Grand Jury certainly cannot find the truth of second explosion without the above evidences.

However, they certainly could not change the original news report, officers' reports & facts (repeated here for emphasis).

(attachment) - NEXUS magazine -- (See page 7 on NEXUS, December 1996 - January 1997, by Ian Goddard)

=========
...
5. That bombs were found inside the building, while largely unknown, is no secret. It was reported widely on CNN and local news broadcasts on the day of the blast. Rescue operations were called off each time a bomb was found (i.e., up to four times), and Army bomb-disposal units worked to defuse the bombs. The bombs were found by bomb-sniffing dogs, which indicates that the bombs contained explosive material.
(It means that the authorities found at least four explosive materials--Alan Yu note).

6. KFOR-TV in Oklahoma City reported that two or more of the bombs found inside were "far larger in magnitude than the first that went off inside the building" (remember that seismic readings measured two blasts). A terrorist expert, Dr. Randall Heather, then spoke, saying, "We have both of the bombs that were defuse at the site and they are being taken apart." One must assume, however, that these bombs were eventually misplaced by the FBI, as is common. The news coverage went on to say that another bomb was found strapped to a column next to the day-care center.

It is important to note that such a column-strapped bomb is consistent with the blast pattern damage seen, which Brigadier General Partin, one of the top munitions experts in the world, says is not consistent with an ANFO (ammonium nitrate fuel oil) truck-bomb. He says that demolition charges had to be placed on the columns-and, sure enough, one was found that failed to go off. But, like all these bombs, they just seemed to disappear into oblivion along with any continuing media reports or serious inquiries about these bombs.

=========

According to CNN video-tape on April, 19, 95 report: The Oklahoma County Sheriff's Department claims that the large Bomb Squad truck with trailer, which was used later that day to remove the unexploded bombs found inside the Murrah Building, was outside prior to the bombing because a deputy was using it for "routine errands."

According to the Federal Emergency Management Agency Situation Report for April 20, 1995 which reads: "A second and third bomb were located in the building. The second bomb was disarmed and the third bomb was evacuated (Source: The New American, 20 July 1998, "Proof of Bombs and Cover-up" by William F. Jasper).

The above information proves that according to original report, some unexploded bombs have been found inside the Federal building.

How could they suddenly deny the above facts?

Furthermore, according to General Partin investigative report submitted to the US Congress on 30 July 95, the ANFO truck bomb would not be sufficient to achieve the damage observed at the OKC Bombing.

Retired Air Force General Ben Partin, former commander of the Air Force Armament Technology Laboratory released a report that there HAD to have been explosive charges on the cement columns in the Murrah building in order for them to have been destroyed. An ammonium nitrate bomb could not possibly have done that level of damage to steel reinforced concrete columns on a federal building designed to withstand the complete collapse of the building due to nuclear blast.


(attachment) - Source: The New American, July 20, 1998

=========

"Proof of Bombs and Cover-up" by William F. Jasper

New Evidence


In this article, we present startling new eyewitness testimony concerning demolition charges removed from the Murrah Building and the men who may have planted them there, together with new expert testimony, recently released official records, and some of the most important evidence and supporting documentation that has been reported piecemeal in our previous articles on the bombing. This includes:

World-renowned physicists and an assortment of scientists, engineers, and explosives experts who concur that internal charges must have been used.

A series of Air Force test blasts on concrete structures corroborating General Partin's main contention that air blast from a truck-bomb outside of the building could not possibly account for the pattern and magnitude of the damage to the Murrah Building's superstructure.

A study by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) which acknowledges that a truck bomb of 4,800 pounds of ANFO (as claimed by the government) would have been insufficient to cause the destruction experienced at the Murrah Building.
=========

The above facts only prove that some corrupted LEO who was in charge of the OKC Bombing investigation might have committed obstruction-of-justice.